What is your mindset when applying and interviewing for jobs? ASK Mentor Vic Glowacki shares some tips for flexible thinking through the job search process!
Flexible thinking is an essential part of success in the professional world, no matter what profession you are in. ASK Mentor Vic Glowacki shares with us some of his flexible thinking tips for the job search process, as well as when you are a new hire.
As a side issue to flexible thinking, it would also be a useful approach when it comes to the dreaded job interview. In many environments, both public and private, the interview process may seem dreaded because there are no instant results from it; by the time a resume is submitted to the time a position is being offered can seem to drag on for upwards of 30 days. Keeping track, or attempting to, of several submissions is even more stressful. True, you are not earning any money in between, and as they say, there are no guarantees.
I realize there are various ways to submit a resume:-
There is the famous monster.com approach of putting it out there for the world to see; last I heard, once it is out there it is hard to update, so there is little or no control.
-
There is also the now common e-mail approach, where you can control the content before sending, but the risk is it may wind up in the wrong person's "mailbox."
-
There is the now old fashioned snail mail routine which some companies still use only because they don't have or can't afford the software for the e-mail transition. I would not shy away from the last one, but the risk here is the risk of the resume getting lost or delivered too late for you to be considered for the position.
-
The straight telephone appointment prevalent in my day is probably a thing of the past as is the come in and fill out an application approach; with those, you never know what you will wind up with for a response on the employer side or even if the position exists. I have had that happen as well.
Regardless of the approach you use, I would strongly suggest that you have someone, preferably in your family, critique the resume before you hit the send button. It may be that constructive criticism may make the difference in the next step for you; it could be the need for one word or the deleting of a word or sentence that makes the difference. By all means, don't be more than two pages with the submission. The receiver won't read anything beyond that, no matter how promising.
If you don't have a family member willing or available, I would suggest taking the resume to a resume writing specialist. If you have no confidence or experience writing one, I would suggest start there. It is worth the dollars expensed for this service. I took my resume there for polishing up grammar and tips on what to accent.
As a precursor of what should happen next after you submit a resume for consideration, the window of a response is now on the side of the employer. The resume you send is one of maybe up to 40 others for the same position; it takes times to sort through and usually it is the personnel or human relations person who sees it first. I will call this person the screener in the following. When the finance department puts out a job opening, they will outline the general specification of duties and salary range most of the time and how to apply. Needless to say, there will be a screening process between the screener and the department head regarding who would be a good match potentially. It involves also the availability of the two to find time for this process, hence the time element delay. A typical scenario would be to narrow the field down to, say, 5 people to closely resemble the specs. However you are contacted, either phone or e-mail, the screener will usually set up the appointed day and time to basically fill in the blanks based on the resume.
Strictly as a suggestion, I have found that the best times for interviewing with such people is mid morning hour, no later than 11 AM and on a "early" day in the week, no later than Wednesday. I say this because the screener will not want to hear about your experiences late in the day, having heard others before you or after a few days of the same old, same old. After all, you are dealing with another human being. In some situations, there may be two interviews in one day or done on separate days. You won't know which one to deal with until you get there; again, flexible thinking is involved here.
I don't want to sound discriminatory here, but there is a difference in the interview process of speaking with a male or female screener. The same can be said regarding the department head. Let us assume a quadrant: male applicant, male screener, male applicant, female screener; male applicant, male department head and male applicant, female department head. For the male applicant, guess which one is the hardest interview to handle? Without a doubt, for me as a male applicant, it is the female screener. Without trying to sound bigoted, it is true of the Caucasian, African American, Hispanic and Asian screener. I have spoken to all. They are generally harder to convince that you are the "right" person for the job. From what I have heard about female applicants, the same line holds true: male screeners are tougher to convince; it is a nature of the person type of thing, I believe; it has nothing to do with you personally.
The screener has seen all types of individuals before you and they can spot very easily someone who tries to "BS" their way through an interview. That spells automatic rejection letter; sugar coating your experience or academic record won't get you very far, they can legally check whether you attended a given school; that is all, but it is enough to make a difference. The same is true about job experience; whether you worked there is all they ask, what they volunteer as a response can also make a difference. The screener looks for people, of course, for every department of the company, not just finance.
Perhaps as a point of backing up, I would suggest showing up at the designated office about 15 minutes prior, in case you have to fill out an application. Also, be prepared to show your license and social security card, for that could be part of the process or on the day of hire. For men, a shirt and tie would be minimum dress although a suit, as opposed to sport coat, would be a good thing. As they say, image is everything as well as good grooming. For the female, a blouse and black pants is a normal outfit; sorry, no party dresses or anything suggestive. Keep fragrance to a minimum; the last thing a screener needs is a walking Calvin Klein.
If the interview process involves a second interview on the same day as the screening, you will mentally need to shift gears (flexible thinking) regarding what to say to the department head. The focus of the questions will be more acute to the department and I suggest when you respond to the question to secretly count to 5 before you speak. Why? I learned long ago that even if you know the answer before the question has been finished, it makes the other person believe you are thinking about the answer; the department does not need and is not looking for a "smart ass" who thinks is above everyone in the department. After all, you have not been hired yet. At the end of each interview, be sure to thank the person for their time.As to the idea of sending a thank you afterwards, it is up to you. I have seen plus and minus on this element; I don't believe it will make much of a difference if you wind up being hired based on that alone. Chances are both the screener and department head will have evaluated you compared to the others before you leave. It does depend on whether you are the first one interviewed or the last because the "bar" has already been established with the job description.
The basics of seeming calm and an occasional smile are in order, even though you are grimacing on the inside. I remember years ago when I was experiencing a sinus headache coming on during the interview; what do you do? You could plead for a continuance or plow ahead as I did. I was on the second interview with the controller when I asked him: What will I do for you? He was taken aback by the question, appreciated it, and recommended I be hired all because I asked that. I am not saying that will work in all cases, but it does not hurt to ask the question toward the end of the interview. I would up staying at that company for the next 3 years and work through 2 subsequent department heads and 4 supervisors in that same time frame.
You can also get the question, in so many words, about where do you see yourself 5 years from now. Of course, there is no standard answer for that, but I tried the line that I will be 5 years smarter, not older. I knew there was no chance of landing that particular job, but the interviewer appreciated the answer.
The inference for all this "advice" is that the position being offered is non managerial. The thought of applying for a supervisor or manager position is daunting. First of all, the qualification for such a post is a master's degree in many cases as well as at least 5 years of actual experience. The manager title does not refer to being a "shift manager" at a restaurant; they are looking for equal experience load and how you get along with other people. In that case, it is very hard to "BS" your way through that; there will also be less applicants for these positions because of the qualifications and the other element will be to find out if you are in it for the "long haul." After all, such a person will handle the day to day business within the department. That means spending at least 5 years with a group of fellow workers who will typically resent you because you are an outsider and adapting to the tried and true ways the trench people have had success with will be intimidating. Many times a manager will want to reinvent the wheel on contact with the group; that is the recipe for disaster; remember the flexible thinking points outlined already. The manager will, of course, have some set ways regarding his own internal functions; that's fine as long as they don't overlap into another worker's basic work. There must, out of necessity, be some give and take and should be established early in the relationship.Since I have outlined the major points about team play within the department, and have included a ton about flexible thinking, the next tough step is in your court: the dreaded first day of work and getting along with fellow workers in your department and usually the other department heads or people you will be dealing with regularly. I was fortunate enough to get a welcome cake at my government job; that was standard for every new hire, regardless of department. You also got one for your last day, if you were there for any good length of time. Although, for my retirement, I insisted that no party be planned for me, I had been to too many other gatherings like that with people letting their hair down too much, besides the beers, and I said I don't need that. Instead, a retirement lunch with upwards of 30 people came to wish me well was the result, with my wife being a principal contributor. I will just say that it was gratifying to see a turnout.
Vic Glowacki is a retired professional with over 30 years of accounting and finance experience (15 yrs in government and 15 years in the private sector). He obtained a BS in Business Administration. To connect with Vic, and other mentors like him, please visit http://ask.depaul.edu. Questions? Call 312-362-8281 or email us at ask@depaul.edu.


